GeForce 7950 GX2
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 7950 GX2 vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce 7950 GX2

2016Core: 795 MHzBoost: 861 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 7950 GX2 is positioned at rank #729 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7950 GX2

#719
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
31932%
#721
28947%
#722
28871%
#726
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
26253%
#727
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
26074%
#729
GeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $80
100%
#730
Mobility Radeon X1450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#731
MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
97%
#732
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
88%
#733
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
88%
#734
GeForce 6200
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
85%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
65%
#737
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
59%
#738
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
59%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
47%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
44%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
29%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
29%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
24%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 7950 GX2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3795.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7950 GX2.

InsightGeForce 7950 GX2GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3795.5%)
Leading raw performance (+3795.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $80 for the GeForce 7950 GX2, it costs 6% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 4055.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 7950 GX2GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+4055.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7950 GX2 and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce 7950 GX2

The GeForce 7950 GX2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 202 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 7950 GX2 scores 202 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 3795.5%. The GeForce 7950 GX2 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 861 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
202
7,869+3796%
Architecture
Maxwell
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
512
896+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8817 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+238%
Boost Clock
861 MHz
1665 MHz+93%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
32
56+75%
L1 Cache
256 KB
896 KB+250%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 7950 GX2 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
9.0c
12+33%
Vulkan
N/A
1.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6+119%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP1) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
None
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP1)
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,WMV
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 7950 GX2 draws 23W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 106.1% difference. The GeForce 7950 GX2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
23W-69%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
229mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
8.8
104.9+1092%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 7950 GX2 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 6.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.5 (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 4096% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$599
$149-75%
Avg Price (30d)
$80
$75-6%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
104.9+4096%
Codename
GM107
TU117
Release
June 28 2016
April 23 2019
Ranking
#764
#323