GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon HD 6320M

NVIDIA

GeForce 7950 GX2

2016Core: 795 MHzBoost: 861 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6320M

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon HD 6320M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon HD 6320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon HD 6320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 7950 GX2

2016

Why buy it

  • 15.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 23W instead of 186W, a 163W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6320M

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 7950 GX2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • 708.7% higher power demand at 186W vs 23W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 7950 GX2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (202 vs 198), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 7950 GX2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 7950 GX2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon HD 6320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 7950 GX2

The GeForce 7950 GX2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 202 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6320M

The Radeon HD 6320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 198 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 7950 GX2 scores 202 and the Radeon HD 6320M reaches 198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7950 GX2 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6320M uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320M). Raw compute: 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320M).

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2Radeon HD 6320M
G3D Mark Score
202+2%
198
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512
1280+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8817 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+118%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L1 Cache
256 KB
320 KB+25%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 7950 GX2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6320M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2Radeon HD 6320M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 7950 GX2 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6320M carries 512 MB. GeForce 7950 GX2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 7950 GX2 and System on the Radeon HD 6320M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6320M) — the GeForce 7950 GX2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2Radeon HD 6320M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2Radeon HD 6320M
DirectX
9.0c
11.2+24%
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
4.4+110%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs None (Radeon HD 6320M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP1) vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 6320M).

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2Radeon HD 6320M
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP1)
UVD 3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,WMV
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 7950 GX2 draws 23W versus the Radeon HD 6320M's 186W — a 156% difference. The GeForce 7950 GX2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 95.

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2Radeon HD 6320M
TDP
23W-88%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
229mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85-11%
95
Perf/Watt
8.8+700%
1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 7950 GX2 (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 7950 GX2Radeon HD 6320M
MSRP
$599
Codename
GM107
Cayman
Release
June 28 2016
December 1 2011
Ranking
#764
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.