
GeForce 7950 GX2

Radeon HD 4650 AGP
GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 7950 GX2
2016Why buy it
- ✅17.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 23W instead of 45W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌648.8% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌18.7% longer card at 229mm vs 193mm.
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $519 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 671% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 193mm instead of 229mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 7950 GX2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌95.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 23W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 7950 GX2
The GeForce 7950 GX2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 202 points.

Radeon HD 4650 AGP
The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 208 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 7950 GX2 scores 202 and the Radeon HD 4650 AGP reaches 208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7950 GX2 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 480 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Raw compute: 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650 AGP).
| Feature | GeForce 7950 GX2 | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 202 | 208+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+7% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8817 TFLOPS+53% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+433% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 7950 GX2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 7950 GX2 | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 7950 GX2 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP carries 512 MB. GeForce 7950 GX2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 7950 GX2 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4650 AGP. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) — the GeForce 7950 GX2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 7950 GX2 | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 7950 GX2 | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.1+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP1) vs UVD 2.
| Feature | GeForce 7950 GX2 | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP1) | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,WMV | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7950 GX2 draws 23W versus the Radeon HD 4650 AGP's 45W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce 7950 GX2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 193mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 7950 GX2 | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 23W-49% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 193mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.8+91% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 7950 GX2 came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4650 AGP was 86.6% cheaper ($519 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 7950 GX2) vs 2.6 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) — the Radeon HD 4650 AGP offers 766.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 7950 GX2 (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 7950 GX2 | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $80-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 2.6+767% |
| Codename | GM107 | Onega |
| Release | June 28 2016 | April 19 2011 |
| Ranking | #764 | #926 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














