GeForce 820A vs Radeon R5 M335

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 820A vs Radeon R5 M335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 820A vs Radeon R5 M335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 820A

2014

Why buy it

✅46.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 M335

2016

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 820A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 820A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (556 vs 549), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 820A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 820A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 51.9% (5.6 vs 3.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 820A vs Radeon R5 M335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 820A

The GeForce 820A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points.

Radeon R5 M335

The Radeon R5 M335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 549 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 820A scores 556 and the Radeon R5 M335 reaches 549 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 820A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 M335 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 820A) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M335). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 820A) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M335). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 820A	Radeon R5 M335
G3D Mark Score	556+1%	549
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	320+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5888 TFLOPS	0.6592 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz+12%	1030 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	20+25%
L1 Cache	128 KB+60%	80 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 820A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M335 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 820A	Radeon R5 M335
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 820A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M335 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M335 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 820A and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M335. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 820A) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 M335) — the GeForce 820A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 820A	Radeon R5 M335
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 820A draws 33W versus the Radeon R5 M335's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 820A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 820A) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M335). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce 820A	Radeon R5 M335
TDP	33W-56%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Mobile
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	16.8+130%	7.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 820A came in at $100, while the Radeon R5 M335 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce 820A was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.6 (GeForce 820A) vs 3.7 (Radeon R5 M335) — the GeForce 820A offers 51.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M335 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce 820A	Radeon R5 M335
MSRP	$100-33%	$150
Performance per Dollar	5.6+51%	3.7
Codename	GM108	Jet
Release	July 22 2014	May 15 2016
Ranking	#832	#922

Search GeForce 820A on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.