GeForce 820A vs Radeon R7 M265
GeForce 820A
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M265
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 820A is positioned at rank 452 and the Radeon R7 M265 is on rank 249, so the Radeon R7 M265 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 820A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M265
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M265 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 820A.
| Insight | GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M265 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M265 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 M265
GeForce 820A
The GeForce 820A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points.
Radeon R7 M265
The Radeon R7 M265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 560 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 820A scores 556 and the Radeon R7 M265 reaches 560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 820A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 M265 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 820A) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 M265). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 820A) vs 1.894 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M265). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 556 | 560 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1024+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 1.894 TFLOPS+222% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+24% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 64+300% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 820A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M265 has 4 GB. The Radeon R7 M265 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 820A) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 M265) — the GeForce 820A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 820A) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: N/A (GeForce 820A) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M265). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 820A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M265).
| Feature | GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | N/A | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 820A draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 M265's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 820A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 820A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M265). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.8+354% | 3.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 820A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R7 M265 launched at $130 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.5 (GeForce 820A) vs 18.7 (Radeon R7 M265) — the Radeon R7 M265 offers 1.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-23% | $130 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.5 | 18.7+1% |
| Codename | GM108 | Pitcairn |
| Release | July 22 2014 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #832 | #489 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 M265
