GeForce 8400 SE vs GeForce G 103M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400 SE vs GeForce G 103M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8400 SE vs GeForce G 103M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400 SE

2014

Why buy it

✅96.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce G 103M

2017

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8400 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8400 SE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 96.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7.9% in PassMark G3D (68 vs 63), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8400 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8400 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 8400 SE vs GeForce G 103M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400 SE

The GeForce 8400 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 68 points.

GeForce G 103M

The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 SE scores 68 versus the GeForce G 103M's 63 — the GeForce 8400 SE leads by 7.9%. The GeForce 8400 SE is built on Maxwell while the GeForce G 103M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 384 (GeForce G 103M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce G 103M
G3D Mark Score	68+8%	63
Architecture	Maxwell	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	1.127 TFLOPS+31%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1468 MHz+31%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	24+50%
L1 Cache	192 KB+33%	144 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce G 103M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 SE and 128-bit on the GeForce G 103M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce G 103M) — the GeForce 8400 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce G 103M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 10.0 (GeForce G 103M). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce G 103M
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)+11%	10.0
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 8400 SE) vs No (GeForce G 103M). Decoder: VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G 103M).

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce G 103M
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	VP2	PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400 SE draws 33W versus the GeForce G 103M's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce G 103M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 350W (GeForce G 103M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce G 103M
TDP	33W	30W-9%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	69mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	2.1	2.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G 103M (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce G 103M
MSRP	$50	—
Codename	GM108	GP108
Release	March 17 2014	May 17 2017
Ranking	#850	#641

Search GeForce 8400 SE on Amazon

Search GeForce G 103M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.