
GeForce 8400 SE

Mobility Radeon HD 3410
GeForce 8400 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 3410 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 3410 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce 8400 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 3410: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400 SE
2014Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 3410 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400 SE
The GeForce 8400 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 68 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 3410
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 SE scores 68 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3410's 63 — the GeForce 8400 SE leads by 7.9%. The GeForce 8400 SE is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3410).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 68+8% | 63 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 0.88 TFLOPS+2% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 40+150% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8400 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 SE and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3410. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) — the GeForce 8400 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+10% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 8400 SE) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 3410). Decoder: VP2 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | VP2 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400 SE draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3410's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3410). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 70-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400 SE came in at $50, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 3410 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 1.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) — the GeForce 8400 SE offers 7.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8400 SE (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $49-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| Codename | GM108 | M98 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #850 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














