GeForce 8500 GT vs Quadro FX 1700M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8500 GT vs Quadro FX 1700M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8500 GT vs Quadro FX 1700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8500 GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 189W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 1700M
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ❌26% higher power demand at 189W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8500 GT vs Quadro FX 1700M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8500 GT
The GeForce 8500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points.

Quadro FX 1700M
The Quadro FX 1700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 173 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8500 GT scores 169 and the Quadro FX 1700M reaches 173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8500 GT is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 1700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8500 GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700M).
| Feature | GeForce 8500 GT | Quadro FX 1700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 169 | 173+2% |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8500 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1700M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8500 GT | Quadro FX 1700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8500 GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1700M carries 512 MB. GeForce 8500 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8500 GT and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700M.
| Feature | GeForce 8500 GT | Quadro FX 1700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8500 GT) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro FX 1700M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8500 GT | Quadro FX 1700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1 (10_0)+11% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8500 GT) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro FX 1700M).
| Feature | GeForce 8500 GT | Quadro FX 1700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8500 GT draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 1700M's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 8500 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8500 GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8500 GT | Quadro FX 1700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1+22% | 0.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














