GeForce 8500 GT vs Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA

GeForce 8500 GT

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700M

2008Core: 610 MHz

GeForce 8500 GT vs Quadro FX 1700M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8500 GT vs Quadro FX 1700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8500 GT vs Quadro FX 1700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8500 GT

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 189W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 1700M

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
  • 26% higher power demand at 189W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 1700M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (173 vs 169), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8500 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8500 GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 1700M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 8500 GT vs Quadro FX 1700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8500 GT

The GeForce 8500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700M

The Quadro FX 1700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 173 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8500 GT scores 169 and the Quadro FX 1700M reaches 173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8500 GT is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 1700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8500 GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700M).

FeatureGeForce 8500 GTQuadro FX 1700M
G3D Mark Score
169
173+2%
Architecture
G9x
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
65 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
224
240+7%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8500 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1700M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 8500 GTQuadro FX 1700M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8500 GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1700M carries 512 MB. GeForce 8500 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8500 GT and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700M.

FeatureGeForce 8500 GTQuadro FX 1700M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8500 GT) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro FX 1700M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8500 GTQuadro FX 1700M
DirectX
10.0
11.1 (10_0)+11%
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8500 GT) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro FX 1700M).

FeatureGeForce 8500 GTQuadro FX 1700M
Encoder
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8500 GT draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 1700M's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 8500 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8500 GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce 8500 GTQuadro FX 1700M
TDP
150W-21%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
1.1+22%
0.9