
FirePro 2460

GeForce 8500 GT
FirePro 2460 vs GeForce 8500 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2460 vs GeForce 8500 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2460 vs GeForce 8500 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2460
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 173mm, a 3mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌102.2% HIGHER MSRP$180 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
GeForce 8500 GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2460 vs GeForce 8500 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2460
The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce 8500 GT
The GeForce 8500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2460 scores 170 and the GeForce 8500 GT reaches 169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2460 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 8500 GT uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2460) vs 224 (GeForce 8500 GT).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 169 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+129% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8500 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 2460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2460 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8500 GT carries 1 GB. GeForce 8500 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2460 and 64-bit on the GeForce 8500 GT.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2460) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8500 GT). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11+10% | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4+33% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2460) vs No (GeForce 8500 GT). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2460) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8500 GT).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2460 draws 75W versus the GeForce 8500 GT's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro 2460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2460) vs 350W (GeForce 8500 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 173mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.3+109% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2460 came in at $180, while the GeForce 8500 GT launched at $89. On MSRP, GeForce 8500 GT was 50.6% cheaper ($91 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2460) vs 1.9 (GeForce 8500 GT) — the GeForce 8500 GT offers 111.1% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2460 (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $180 | $89-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 1.9+111% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | June 13 2012 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #732 | #825 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














