
FirePro 2460

Quadro FX 380
FirePro 2460 vs Quadro FX 380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2460 vs Quadro FX 380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2460 vs Quadro FX 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2460
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌39.5% HIGHER MSRP$180 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quadro FX 380
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2460 vs Quadro FX 380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2460
The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro FX 380
The Quadro FX 380 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 177 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2460 scores 170 and the Quadro FX 380 reaches 177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2460 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 380 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2460) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2460) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 177+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+113% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+23% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2460 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 380 carries 256 MB. FirePro 2460 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2460 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2460) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11+10% | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2460 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 380's 189W — a 86.4% difference. The FirePro 2460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2460) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-60% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.3+156% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2460 came in at $180, while the Quadro FX 380 launched at $129. On MSRP, Quadro FX 380 was 28.3% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2460) vs 1.4 (Quadro FX 380) — the Quadro FX 380 offers 55.6% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2460 (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $180 | $129-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 1.4+56% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GT200B |
| Release | June 13 2012 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #732 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














