FirePro 2460 vs Quadro FX 380

FirePro 2460

2012Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 2460 vs Quadro FX 380 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2460 vs Quadro FX 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2460

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 39.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $180 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quadro FX 380

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
  • Delivers 45.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
  • Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 380 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (177 vs 170), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 2460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $180, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 45.3% (1.4 vs 0.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 2460 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 2460 vs Quadro FX 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2460

The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380

The Quadro FX 380 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 177 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 2460 scores 170 and the Quadro FX 380 reaches 177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2460 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 380 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2460) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2460) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380).

FeatureFirePro 2460Quadro FX 380
G3D Mark Score
170
177+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
512+113%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS+23%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 2460Quadro FX 380
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2460 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 380 carries 256 MB. FirePro 2460 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2460 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380.

FeatureFirePro 2460Quadro FX 380
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2460) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 2460Quadro FX 380
DirectX
11+10%
10_0
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2460 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 380's 189W — a 86.4% difference. The FirePro 2460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2460) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureFirePro 2460Quadro FX 380
TDP
75W-60%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
2.3+156%
0.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2460 came in at $180, while the Quadro FX 380 launched at $129. On MSRP, Quadro FX 380 was 28.3% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2460) vs 1.4 (Quadro FX 380) — the Quadro FX 380 offers 55.6% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2460 (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureFirePro 2460Quadro FX 380
MSRP
$180
$129-28%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
1.4+56%
Codename
Cape Verde
GT200B
Release
June 13 2012
November 11 2008
Ranking
#732
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.