FirePro 2460 vs Radeon HD 3450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2460 vs Radeon HD 3450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 2460 vs Radeon HD 3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2460

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
260% HIGHER MSRP
$180 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 3450

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
✅Delivers 279.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 3450 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.3% in PassMark G3D (179 vs 170), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 2460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 3450 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $130 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $180, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 279.1% (3.6 vs 0.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3450 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 2460 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 2460 vs Radeon HD 3450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2460

The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 3450

The Radeon HD 3450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2460 scores 170 versus the Radeon HD 3450's 179 — the Radeon HD 3450 leads by 5.3%. The FirePro 2460 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 3450 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2460) vs 800 (Radeon HD 3450). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2460) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3450).

Feature	FirePro 2460	Radeon HD 3450
G3D Mark Score	170	179+5%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	512	800+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS	1 TFLOPS+30%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 2460	Radeon HD 3450
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2460 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 3450.

Feature	FirePro 2460	Radeon HD 3450
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2460 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 3450's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The FirePro 2460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2460) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro 2460	Radeon HD 3450
TDP	75W-32%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	170mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.3+44%	1.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2460 came in at $180, while the Radeon HD 3450 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3450 was 72.2% cheaper ($130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2460) vs 3.6 (Radeon HD 3450) — the Radeon HD 3450 offers 300% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2460 (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	FirePro 2460	Radeon HD 3450
MSRP	$180	$50-72%
Performance per Dollar	0.9	3.6+300%
Codename	Cape Verde	RV770
Release	June 13 2012	June 25 2008
Ranking	#732	#876

Search FirePro 2460 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 3450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.