Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 2460 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 2460

2012Core: 750 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

2010Core: 700 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 2460 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 Performance Spectrum

FirePro 2460
0.5 GB 75
170
+1.2%
brand logoRadeon HD 6250
brand logoRadeon HD 7290
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON X1800
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 4570
brand logoRadeon R9 270X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
0.25 GB 50
168
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6250
brand logoRadeon HD 7290
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON X1800
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 4350
brand logoRadeon R9 270X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2460 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2460

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    80% HIGHER MSRP
    $180 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 77.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 2460 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (170 vs 168), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 2460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $180, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 77.9% (1.7 vs 0.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 2460 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 2460 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2460

The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 2460 scores 170 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 reaches 168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2460 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2460) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2460) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2600).

FeatureFirePro 2460Mobility Radeon HD 2600
G3D Mark Score
170+1%
168
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512
800+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+46%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 2460Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2460 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 carries 256 MB. FirePro 2460 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2460 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2600.

FeatureFirePro 2460Mobility Radeon HD 2600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2460) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 2460Mobility Radeon HD 2600
DirectX
11+10%
10.0
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2460) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs Avivo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2460) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600).

FeatureFirePro 2460Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Encoder
UVD 2.3
Avivo HD
Decoder
UVD 2.3
Avivo HD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2460 draws 75W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2600's 50W — a 40% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2460) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro 2460Mobility Radeon HD 2600
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
—
Height
69mm
—
Slots
1
—
Temp (Load)
65°C-19%
80°C
Perf/Watt
2.3
3.4+48%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2460 came in at $180, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 launched at $100. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 2600 was 44.4% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2460) vs 1.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 offers 88.9% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2460 (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 2460Mobility Radeon HD 2600
MSRP
$180
$100-44%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
1.7+89%
Codename
Cape Verde
Broadway
Release
June 13 2012
January 7 2010
Ranking
#732
#846
Search FirePro 2460 on AmazonSearch Mobility Radeon HD 2600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.