GeForce 8600 GS vs GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 8600 GS

2008Core: 500 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce 8600 GS

150

179

0.0%

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

7,869

+4296.1%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 8600 GS is positioned at rank #658 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8600 GS

#648

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

6065%

#650

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

5498%

#651

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

5484%

#655

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

4987%

#656

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

4953%

#658

GeForce 8600 GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

100%

#659

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

100%

#660

GeForce 9800M GTS

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

100%

#661

Radeon HD 2900 GT

MSRP: $170|Avg: $15

96%

#662

Radeon HD 8280E

MSRP: $150|Avg: $110

96%

#663

Radeon R5 M420

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

94%

#664

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

94%

#665

Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

93%

#666

Mobility Radeon 4100

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

92%

#667

Radeon HD 2900 XT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $20

92%

#668

GeForce 9300 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

92%

#669

GeForce 9700M GT

MSRP: $200|Avg: $40

92%

#670

Mobility Radeon X2500

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

92%

#671

GeForce 9800M GTX

MSRP: $300|Avg: $30

84%

#672

Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $57

84%

#673

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

83%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8600 GS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4296.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8600 GS.

Insight	GeForce 8600 GS	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4296.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4296.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 779.2% better value per dollar than the GeForce 8600 GS.

Insight	GeForce 8600 GS	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+779.2%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($15)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 8600 GS Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8600 GS and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 8600 GS

The GeForce 8600 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8600 GS scores 179 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 4296.1%. The GeForce 8600 GS is built on G9x while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 65 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8600 GS) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce 8600 GS	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	179	7,869+4296%
Architecture	G9x	Turing
Process Node	65 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	224	896+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 8600 GS	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8600 GS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce 8600 GS	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (GeForce 8600 GS) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 8600 GS	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	10_0	12+20%
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce 8600 GS) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9 (GeForce 8600 GS) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce 8600 GS	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	PureVideo HD	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8600 GS draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8600 GS) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 170mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce 8600 GS	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	170mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	78°C	70°C-10%
Perf/Watt	1.2	104.9+8642%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8600 GS launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce 8600 GS costs 80% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.9 (GeForce 8600 GS) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 781.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).