GeForce 8800 GS vs Radeon R5 310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8800 GS vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8800 GS vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8800 GS

2008

Why buy it

✅39.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (768 MB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
206.1% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 208% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8800 GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 768 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8800 GS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 39.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 310 instead at 332 vs 330, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8800 GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 768 MB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 208% (6.8 vs 2.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 8800 GS has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 8800 GS vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8800 GS

The GeForce 8800 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points.

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8800 GS scores 330 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800 GS is built on G9x while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800 GS) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310).

Feature	GeForce 8800 GS	Radeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score	330	332
Architecture	G9x	GCN 3.0
Process Node	65 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	224	384+71%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8800 GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8800 GS	Radeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8800 GS has 768 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 310 carries 512 MB. GeForce 8800 GS gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8800 GS and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310.

Feature	GeForce 8800 GS	Radeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB+50%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8800 GS draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800 GS) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 8800 GS	Radeon R5 310
TDP	150W	50W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.2	6.6+200%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8800 GS came in at $150, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 310 was 67.3% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GeForce 8800 GS) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 209.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 8800 GS	Radeon R5 310
MSRP	$150	$49-67%
Performance per Dollar	2.2	6.8+209%
Codename	NB9E-GTX	Weston
Release	July 15 2008	April 18 2017
Ranking	#825	#873

Search GeForce 8800 GS on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.