
FirePro RG220

GeForce 8800 GS
FirePro RG220 vs GeForce 8800 GS Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro RG220 vs GeForce 8800 GS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro RG220 vs GeForce 8800 GS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro RG220
2013Why buy it
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 229mm, a 59mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 768 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce 8800 GS
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (768 MB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌34.7% longer card at 229mm vs 170mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro RG220 vs GeForce 8800 GS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro RG220
The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.

GeForce 8800 GS
The GeForce 8800 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro RG220 scores 335 and the GeForce 8800 GS reaches 330 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro RG220 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 8800 GS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro RG220) vs 224 (GeForce 8800 GS).
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 335+2% | 330 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+243% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8800 GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro RG220 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro RG220 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800 GS carries 768 MB. GeForce 8800 GS gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro RG220 and 64-bit on the GeForce 8800 GS.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.75 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro RG220) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GS). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro RG220) vs No (GeForce 8800 GS). Decoder: None vs PureVideo HD VP2.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro RG220 draws 150W versus the GeForce 8800 GS's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 8800 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro RG220) vs 350W (GeForce 8800 GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 2.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro RG220 came in at $0, while the GeForce 8800 GS launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro RG220 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro RG220) vs 2.2 (GeForce 8800 GS) — the FirePro RG220 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is FirePro RG220 (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 2.2 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | February 25 2013 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #619 | #825 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














