
FirePro RG220 vs GeForce 8800 GS

FirePro RG220
Popular choices:

GeForce 8800 GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro RG220 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 8800 GS offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro RG220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro RG220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 103% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro RG220 and GeForce 8800 GS

FirePro RG220
The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.

GeForce 8800 GS
The GeForce 8800 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro RG220 scores 335 and the GeForce 8800 GS reaches 330 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro RG220 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 8800 GS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro RG220) vs 224 (GeForce 8800 GS).
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 335+2% | 330 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+243% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro RG220 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800 GS has 768 MB. The GeForce 8800 GS offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.75 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro RG220) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GS). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro RG220) vs No (GeForce 8800 GS). Decoder: None vs PureVideo HD VP2.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro RG220 draws 150W versus the GeForce 8800 GS's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 8800 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro RG220) vs 350W (GeForce 8800 GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 2.2 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro RG220 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 8800 GS launched at $150 and now averages $40. The FirePro RG220 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.8 (FirePro RG220) vs 8.3 (GeForce 8800 GS) — the FirePro RG220 offers 102.4% better value. The FirePro RG220 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-50% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.8+102% | 8.3 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | February 25 2013 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #619 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















