FirePro RG220 vs GeForce 8800 GS

FirePro RG220

2013Core: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 8800 GS

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro RG220 vs GeForce 8800 GS Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro RG220 vs GeForce 8800 GS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro RG220

2013

Why buy it

  • Measures 170mm instead of 229mm, a 59mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 768 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

GeForce 8800 GS

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (768 MB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 34.7% longer card at 229mm vs 170mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro RG220 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (335 vs 330), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro RG220 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 65nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8800 GS makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 8800 GS is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro RG220 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro RG220 vs GeForce 8800 GS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro RG220

The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800 GS

The GeForce 8800 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro RG220 scores 335 and the GeForce 8800 GS reaches 330 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro RG220 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 8800 GS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro RG220) vs 224 (GeForce 8800 GS).

FeatureFirePro RG220GeForce 8800 GS
G3D Mark Score
335+2%
330
Architecture
GCN 1.0
G9x
Process Node
28 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
768+243%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8800 GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro RG220 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro RG220GeForce 8800 GS
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro RG220 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800 GS carries 768 MB. GeForce 8800 GS gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro RG220 and 64-bit on the GeForce 8800 GS.

FeatureFirePro RG220GeForce 8800 GS
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.75 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro RG220) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GS). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro RG220GeForce 8800 GS
DirectX
10.1
10.0
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro RG220) vs No (GeForce 8800 GS). Decoder: None vs PureVideo HD VP2.

FeatureFirePro RG220GeForce 8800 GS
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
None
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro RG220 draws 150W versus the GeForce 8800 GS's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 8800 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro RG220) vs 350W (GeForce 8800 GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 85°C.

FeatureFirePro RG220GeForce 8800 GS
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
170mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
Unknown-100%
85°C
Perf/Watt
2.2
2.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro RG220 came in at $0, while the GeForce 8800 GS launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro RG220 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro RG220) vs 2.2 (GeForce 8800 GS) — the FirePro RG220 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is FirePro RG220 (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureFirePro RG220GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP
$0-100%
$150
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
2.2
Codename
Pitcairn
NB9E-GTX
Release
February 25 2013
July 15 2008
Ranking
#619
#825

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.