FirePro RG220 vs Radeon R5 310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro RG220 vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro RG220 vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro RG220

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro RG220 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (335 vs 332), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro RG220 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 310 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro RG220 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro RG220 vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro RG220

The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro RG220 scores 335 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro RG220 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro RG220) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro RG220) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310).

Feature	FirePro RG220	Radeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score	335	332
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+100%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.267 TFLOPS+61%	0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	48+100%	24
L1 Cache	192 KB+100%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro RG220	Radeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro RG220 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro RG220) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 310) — the FirePro RG220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro RG220	Radeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro RG220 draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro RG220) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro RG220	Radeon R5 310
TDP	150W	50W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	170mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	Unknown	—
Perf/Watt	2.2	6.6+200%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro RG220 came in at $0, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. On MSRP, FirePro RG220 was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro RG220) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the FirePro RG220 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	FirePro RG220	Radeon R5 310
MSRP	$0-100%	$49
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	6.8
Codename	Pitcairn	Weston
Release	February 25 2013	April 18 2017
Ranking	#619	#873

Search FirePro RG220 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.