FirePro RG220
VS
Radeon R5 235

FirePro RG220 vs Radeon R5 235

FirePro RG220

2013Core: 825 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 235

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 235

#411
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1583%
#413
1435%
#414
1431%
#418
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1301%
#419
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1292%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
100%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#424
Radeon R5 310
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
99%
#425
Radeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#426
Radeon HD 7600G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#427
Radeon R7 A265
MSRP: $149|Avg: $149
97%
#428
Radeon R9 M470
MSRP: $350|Avg: $80
97%
#429
Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#431
Mobility Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
96%
#432
Radeon R5 M430
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
96%
#433
GeForce 810A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#434
GeForce GT 520MX
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
94%
#435
Radeon R5 330
MSRP: $81|Avg: $45
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5 235 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro RG220.

InsightFirePro RG220Radeon R5 235
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro RG220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro RG220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $49), it costs 59% less, resulting in a 144.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro RG220Radeon R5 235
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+144.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro RG220 and Radeon R5 235

AMD

FirePro RG220

The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.

AMD

Radeon R5 235

The Radeon R5 235 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 336 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro RG220 scores 335 and the Radeon R5 235 reaches 336 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro RG220 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 235 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro RG220) vs 320 (Radeon R5 235). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro RG220) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235).

FeatureFirePro RG220Radeon R5 235
G3D Mark Score
335
336
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+140%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.267 TFLOPS+92%
0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
48+140%
20
L1 Cache
192 KB+140%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro RG220Radeon R5 235
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro RG220 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 235 has 1 GB. The Radeon R5 235 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro RG220) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 235) — the FirePro RG220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro RG220Radeon R5 235
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro RG220) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 235). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro RG220Radeon R5 235
DirectX
10.1
11.2+11%
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro RG220) vs None (Radeon R5 235). Decoder: None vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureFirePro RG220Radeon R5 235
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
None
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro RG220 draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 235's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R5 235 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro RG220) vs 350W (Radeon R5 235). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75.

FeatureFirePro RG220Radeon R5 235
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
168mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
Unknown-100%
75
Perf/Watt
2.2
11.2+409%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro RG220 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon R5 235 launched at $49 and now averages $49. The FirePro RG220 costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.8 (FirePro RG220) vs 6.9 (Radeon R5 235) — the FirePro RG220 offers 143.5% better value. The Radeon R5 235 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro RG220Radeon R5 235
MSRP
$0-100%
$49
Avg Price (30d)
$20-59%
$49
Performance per Dollar
16.8+143%
6.9
Codename
Pitcairn
Jet
Release
February 25 2013
May 15 2016
Ranking
#619
#922