
FirePro 3D V3750 vs FirePro RG220

FirePro 3D V3750
Popular choices:

FirePro RG220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V3750 is positioned at rank #307 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V3750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro RG220 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro RG220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro RG220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 22.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V3750 and FirePro RG220

FirePro 3D V3750
The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

FirePro RG220
The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V3750 scores 341 and the FirePro RG220 reaches 335 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro RG220 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 768 (FirePro RG220). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro RG220).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 341+2% | 335 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+175% | 1.267 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3750 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro RG220 has 512 MB. The FirePro RG220 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 512 KB (FirePro RG220) — the FirePro 3D V3750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 10.1 (FirePro RG220). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs None (FirePro RG220). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs None.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.2 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3750 draws 274W versus the FirePro RG220's 150W — a 58.5% difference. The FirePro RG220 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 350W (FirePro RG220). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 170mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 2.2+83% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the FirePro RG220 launched at $0 and now averages $20. The FirePro RG220 costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 16.8 (FirePro RG220) — the FirePro RG220 offers 23.5% better value. The FirePro 3D V3750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $20-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 16.8+24% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 18 2014 | February 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #423 | #619 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












