
FirePro 3D V3750 vs Radeon R5 235

FirePro 3D V3750
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 235
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V3750 is positioned at rank 307 and the Radeon R5 235 is on rank 421, so the FirePro 3D V3750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 235
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V3750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 235 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon R5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V3750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V3750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $49), it costs 49% less, resulting in a 98.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon R5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+98.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V3750 and Radeon R5 235

FirePro 3D V3750
The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

Radeon R5 235
The Radeon R5 235 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 336 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V3750 scores 341 and the Radeon R5 235 reaches 336 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 235 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 320 (Radeon R5 235). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon R5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 341+1% | 336 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+540% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+428% | 0.6592 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+540% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+540% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon R5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3750 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 235 has 1 GB. The Radeon R5 235 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 235) — the FirePro 3D V3750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon R5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 1 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 235). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon R5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2+11% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs None (Radeon R5 235). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon R5 235).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon R5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.2 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3750 draws 274W versus the Radeon R5 235's 30W — a 160.5% difference. The Radeon R5 235 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 350W (Radeon R5 235). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon R5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 30W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 11.2+833% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon R5 235 launched at $49 and now averages $49. The FirePro 3D V3750 costs 49% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 6.9 (Radeon R5 235) — the FirePro 3D V3750 offers 97.1% better value. The Radeon R5 235 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon R5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $49-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-49% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6+97% | 6.9 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Jet |
| Release | January 18 2014 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #423 | #922 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















