FirePro 3D V3750 vs Radeon 3015e
FirePro 3D V3750
Popular choices:
Radeon 3015e
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V3750 is positioned at rank 307 and the Radeon 3015e is on rank 414, so the FirePro 3D V3750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3015e
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3015e uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 3015e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V3750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 3015e is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V3750.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V3750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $49 for the Radeon 3015e, it costs 49% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 90.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+90.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V3750 and Radeon 3015e
FirePro 3D V3750
The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.
Radeon 3015e
The Radeon 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 351 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V3750 scores 341 and the Radeon 3015e reaches 351 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 3015e uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 512 (Radeon 3015e). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3015e).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 341 | 351+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+179% | 1.247 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3750 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3015e has 512 MB. The Radeon 3015e offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 512 KB (Radeon 3015e) — the FirePro 3D V3750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon 3015e). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (12_1)+19% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon 3015e). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 3015e).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.2 | VCN 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | VCN 1.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3750 draws 274W versus the Radeon 3015e's 50W — a 138.3% difference. The Radeon 3015e is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 350W (Radeon 3015e). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 50W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 7.0+483% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon 3015e launched at $49 and now averages $49. The FirePro 3D V3750 costs 49% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 7.2 (Radeon 3015e) — the FirePro 3D V3750 offers 88.9% better value. The Radeon 3015e is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $49-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-49% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6+89% | 7.2 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Polaris 23 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #423 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V3750 and Radeon 3015e
