FirePro 3D V3750 vs UHD Graphics 605

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V3750 is positioned at rank #307 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

92%

#292

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8639%

#307

FirePro 3D V3750

MSRP: $199|Avg: $25

100%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

99%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

98%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

96%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

95%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

94%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

92%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

92%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

90%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

89%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

89%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

89%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

88%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V3750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	FirePro 3D V3750	Intel UHD Graphics 605
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+6.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 605 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro 3D V3750 Benchmark Check

Intel UHD Graphics 605 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V3750 and Intel UHD Graphics 605

FirePro 3D V3750

The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

Intel UHD Graphics 605

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 3D V3750 scores 341 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 605's 364 — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 leads by 6.7%. The FirePro 3D V3750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 605).

Feature	FirePro 3D V3750	Intel UHD Graphics 605
G3D Mark Score	341	364+7%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 9.5
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm+++
Shading Units	2048+1013%	184
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.482 TFLOPS+723%	0.4232 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+967%	3
TMUs	128+457%	23

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V3750	Intel UHD Graphics 605
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V3750 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 has 0 MB. The FirePro 3D V3750 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	FirePro 3D V3750	Intel UHD Graphics 605
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 12 (12_1) (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Vulkan: None vs 1.0. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro 3D V3750	Intel UHD Graphics 605
DirectX	10.1	12 (12_1)+19%
Vulkan	None	1.0
OpenGL	3.3	4.4+33%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs Quick Sync Video (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs H.265/HEVC,VP9,H.264,VP8,JPEG,VC-1 (Intel UHD Graphics 605).

Feature	FirePro 3D V3750	Intel UHD Graphics 605
Encoder	UVD 2.2	Quick Sync Video
Decoder	UVD 2.2	Quick Sync Video
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.265/HEVC,VP9,H.264,VP8,JPEG,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V3750 draws 274W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 605's 15W — a 179.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	FirePro 3D V3750	Intel UHD Graphics 605
TDP	274W	15W-95%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	1.2	24.3+1925%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 costs 100+% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 605) — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	FirePro 3D V3750	Intel UHD Graphics 605
MSRP	$199	$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)	$25	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	13.6	Infinity
Codename	Tahiti	Comet Lake GT2
Release	January 18 2014	October 1 2017
Ranking	#423	#824