FirePro 3D V3750 vs Intel UHD Graphics 605

FirePro 3D V3750

2014Core: 850 MHz
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 605

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts

FirePro 3D V3750 vs Intel UHD Graphics 605 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V3750 vs Intel UHD Graphics 605: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V3750

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 605 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro 3D V3750 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1726.7% higher power demand at 274W vs 15W.

Intel UHD Graphics 605

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 274W, a 259W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 605 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6.7% in PassMark G3D (364 vs 341), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V3750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V3750 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel UHD Graphics 605 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 3D V3750 vs Intel UHD Graphics 605 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V3750

The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 605

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 3D V3750 scores 341 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 605's 364 — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 leads by 6.7%. The FirePro 3D V3750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 605).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Intel UHD Graphics 605
G3D Mark Score
341
364+7%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Generation 9.5
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
2048+1013%
184
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+723%
0.4232 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+967%
3
TMUs
128+457%
23

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Intel UHD Graphics 605
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V3750 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 carries 0 MB. FirePro 3D V3750 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V3750 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 605.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Intel UHD Graphics 605
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 12 (12_1) (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Vulkan: None vs 1.0. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Intel UHD Graphics 605
DirectX
10.1
12 (12_1)+19%
Vulkan
None
1.0
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs Quick Sync Video (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs H.265/HEVC,VP9,H.264,VP8,JPEG,VC-1 (Intel UHD Graphics 605).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Intel UHD Graphics 605
Encoder
UVD 2.2
Quick Sync Video
Decoder
UVD 2.2
Quick Sync Video
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.265/HEVC,VP9,H.264,VP8,JPEG,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V3750 draws 274W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 605's 15W — a 179.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Intel UHD Graphics 605
TDP
274W
15W-95%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
1.2
24.3+1925%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V3750 came in at $199, while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 605 was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 605) — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 605 (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Intel UHD Graphics 605
MSRP
$199
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.7
Infinity
Codename
Tahiti
Comet Lake GT2
Release
January 18 2014
October 1 2017
Ranking
#423
#824

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.