FirePro 3D V3750 vs GeForce 9800M GTS
FirePro 3D V3750
Popular choices:
GeForce 9800M GTS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V3750 is positioned at rank 307 and the GeForce 9800M GTS is on rank 658, so the FirePro 3D V3750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GTS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro 3D V3750 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The FirePro 3D V3750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800M GTS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9800M GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V3750.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9800M GTS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9800M GTS holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 74.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+74.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V3750 and GeForce 9800M GTS
FirePro 3D V3750
The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.
GeForce 9800M GTS
The GeForce 9800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V3750 scores 341 and the GeForce 9800M GTS reaches 357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 9800M GTS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 224 (GeForce 9800M GTS).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 341 | 357+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+814% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3750 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9800M GTS has 512 MB. The GeForce 9800M GTS offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GTS). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs No (GeForce 9800M GTS). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GTS).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.2 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3750 draws 274W versus the GeForce 9800M GTS's 150W — a 58.5% difference. The GeForce 9800M GTS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 350W (GeForce 9800M GTS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-22% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 2.4+100% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce 9800M GTS launched at $200 and now averages $15. The GeForce 9800M GTS costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 23.8 (GeForce 9800M GTS) — the GeForce 9800M GTS offers 75% better value. The FirePro 3D V3750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $15-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 23.8+75% |
| Codename | Tahiti | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | January 18 2014 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #423 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V3750 and GeForce 9800M GTS
