CPU
GPU
FirePro 3D V3750
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7620G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V3750 is positioned at rank 307 and the Radeon HD 7620G is on rank 415, so the FirePro 3D V3750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7620G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7620G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V3750.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7620G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7620G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $25), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 161.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+161.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V3750 and Radeon HD 7620G
FirePro 3D V3750
The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.
Radeon HD 7620G
The Radeon HD 7620G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V3750 scores 341 and the Radeon HD 7620G reaches 357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7620G uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7620G). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7620G).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 341 | 357+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+327% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+505% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+967% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3750 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7620G has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7620G offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7620G) — the FirePro 3D V3750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7620G). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2+11% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7620G). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3750 draws 274W versus the Radeon HD 7620G's 45W — a 143.6% difference. The Radeon HD 7620G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7620G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 45W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 7.9+558% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon HD 7620G launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 7620G costs 60% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 35.7 (Radeon HD 7620G) — the Radeon HD 7620G offers 162.5% better value. The FirePro 3D V3750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $50-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $10-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 35.7+163% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Turks |
| Release | January 18 2014 | January 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #423 | #870 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V3750 and Radeon HD 7620G
