
GeForce 8800 GT

GeForce GT 320
GeForce 8800 GT vs GeForce GT 320 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8800 GT vs GeForce GT 320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Civilization VI
GeForce 8800 GT vs GeForce GT 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8800 GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅6.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌215.2% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
- ❌30.9% longer card at 229mm vs 175mm.
GeForce GT 320
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 224.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 175mm instead of 229mm, a 54mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8800 GT across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8800 GT vs GeForce GT 320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8800 GT
The GeForce 8800 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 457 points.

GeForce GT 320
The GeForce GT 320 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 470 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8800 GT scores 457 and the GeForce GT 320 reaches 470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800 GT is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 320 uses Pascal, both on 65 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800 GT) vs 384 (GeForce GT 320).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GT | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 457 | 470+3% |
| Architecture | G9x | Pascal |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 384+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GT | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8800 GT and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GT | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GT) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 320). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GT | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800 GT) vs None (GeForce GT 320). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800 GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 320).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GT | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD (VP4) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8800 GT draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 320's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800 GT) vs 250W (GeForce GT 320). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GT | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 229mm | 175mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.0 | 15.7+423% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8800 GT came in at $249, while the GeForce GT 320 launched at $79. On MSRP, GeForce GT 320 was 68.3% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (GeForce 8800 GT) vs 5.9 (GeForce GT 320) — the GeForce GT 320 offers 227.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 320 (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GT | GeForce GT 320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $79-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.8 | 5.9+228% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GP108 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #825 | #641 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














