
FirePro 3D V3800

GeForce 8800 GT
FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce 8800 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce 8800 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce 8800 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V3800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 99.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.7 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 74W instead of 150W, a 76W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce 8800 GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌93% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌102.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 74W.
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V3800 vs GeForce 8800 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V3800
The FirePro 3D V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $479.

GeForce 8800 GT
The GeForce 8800 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 457 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V3800 scores 472 and the GeForce 8800 GT reaches 457 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 8800 GT uses G9x, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 224 (GeForce 8800 GT).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 472+3% | 457 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | G9x |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+257% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8800 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V3800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3800 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800 GT carries 1 GB. GeForce 8800 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V3800 and 64-bit on the GeForce 8800 GT.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GT). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+12% | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 4.4+33% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs No (GeForce 8800 GT). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800 GT).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3800 draws 74W versus the GeForce 8800 GT's 150W — a 67.9% difference. The FirePro 3D V3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 350W (GeForce 8800 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W-51% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 229mm |
| Height | 64mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4+113% | 3.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V3800 came in at $129, while the GeForce 8800 GT launched at $249. On MSRP, FirePro 3D V3800 was 48.2% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.7 (FirePro 3D V3800) vs 1.8 (GeForce 8800 GT) — the FirePro 3D V3800 offers 105.6% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V3800 (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3800 | GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-48% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.7+106% | 1.8 |
| Codename | Juniper | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | April 26 2010 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #780 | #825 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














