GeForce 8800M GTX
VS
Radeon HD 7550M

GeForce 8800M GTX vs Radeon HD 7550M

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800M GTX

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7550M

2012Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8800M GTX is positioned at rank 378 and the Radeon HD 7550M is on rank 345, so the Radeon HD 7550M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800M GTX

#368
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1175%
#370
1065%
#371
1062%
#375
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
966%
#376
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
959%
#378
GeForce 8800M GTX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
96%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
94%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
93%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
93%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
93%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
92%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7550M

#335
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
934%
#337
846%
#338
844%
#342
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
767%
#343
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
762%
#345
Radeon HD 7550M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
97%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
96%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
94%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
93%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7550M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8800M GTX.

InsightGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon HD 7550M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7550M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8800M GTX and Radeon HD 7550M

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800M GTX

The GeForce 8800M GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 462 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7550M

The Radeon HD 7550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 465 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8800M GTX scores 462 and the Radeon HD 7550M reaches 465 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800M GTX is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 7550M uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7550M).

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon HD 7550M
G3D Mark Score
462
465
Architecture
G9x
GCN 1.0
Process Node
65 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
640+186%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon HD 7550M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8800M GTX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7550M has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7550M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon HD 7550M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8800M GTX draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7550M's 40W — a 115.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7550M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7550M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon HD 7550M
TDP
150W
40W-73%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
95°C
Perf/Watt
3.1
11.6+274%