GeForce 8800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800M GTX

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 8800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8800M GTX

2008

Why buy it

  • 53.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 M240

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 8800M GTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8800M GTX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 53.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 M240 instead at 473 vs 462, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8800M GTX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 M240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 8800M GTX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 8800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800M GTX

The GeForce 8800M GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 462 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M240

The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8800M GTX scores 462 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800M GTX is built on G9x while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240).

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon R5 M240
G3D Mark Score
462
473+2%
Architecture
G9x
GCN 1.0
Process Node
65 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
320+43%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8800M GTX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon R5 M240
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8800M GTX and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon R5 M240
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon R5 M240
DirectX
10.0
12+20%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon R5 M240
Encoder
No
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
UVD 4.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8800M GTX draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon R5 M240
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
95°C
Perf/Watt
3.1
15.8+410%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 M240 (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTXRadeon R5 M240
MSRP
$100
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Oland
Release
July 15 2008
October 8 2013
Ranking
#825
#911

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.