
GeForce 8800M GTX

Radeon R5 M240
GeForce 8800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8800M GTX
2008Why buy it
- ✅53.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
Radeon R5 M240
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8800M GTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8800M GTX
The GeForce 8800M GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 462 points.

Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8800M GTX scores 462 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800M GTX is built on G9x while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240).
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 462 | 473+2% |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 320+43% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8800M GTX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8800M GTX and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8800M GTX draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800M GTX) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1 | 15.8+410% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R5 M240 (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Oland |
| Release | July 15 2008 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #825 | #911 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














