GeForce 910M vs Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 M330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 910M is positioned at rank 185 and the Radeon R5 M330 is on rank 480, so the GeForce 910M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 910M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M330
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 910M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 M330 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 910M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 910M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 910M and Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
The GeForce 910M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 600 points.
Radeon R5 M330
The Radeon R5 M330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 596 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 910M scores 600 and the Radeon R5 M330 reaches 596 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 910M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 M330 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 910M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M330).
| Feature | GeForce 910M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 600 | 596 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 910M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 910M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M330 has 4 GB. The Radeon R5 M330 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 910M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 910M) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R5 M330). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 910M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 910M) vs UVD (Radeon R5 M330). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 910M) vs H.264,HEVC,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon R5 M330).
| Feature | GeForce 910M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,MPEG-4,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 910M draws 33W versus the Radeon R5 M330's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 910M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 910M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M330). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce 910M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-21% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2+130% | 7.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 910M and Radeon R5 M330
