GeForce 910M vs Radeon R6 M255DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 910M is positioned at rank #185 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 910M

#174

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

362%

#176

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

328%

#177

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

327%

#181

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

298%

#182

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

296%

#184

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

100%

#185

GeForce 910M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#186

GeForce MX550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#194

GeForce GT625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

94%

#196

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R6 M255DX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 910M.

Insight	GeForce 910M	Radeon R6 M255DX
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R6 M255DX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 910M Benchmark Check

Radeon R6 M255DX Benchmark Check

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 910M and Radeon R6 M255DX

GeForce 910M

The GeForce 910M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 600 points.

Radeon R6 M255DX

The Radeon R6 M255DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 605 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 910M scores 600 and the Radeon R6 M255DX reaches 605 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 910M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R6 M255DX uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 910M) vs 896 (Radeon R6 M255DX).

Feature	GeForce 910M	Radeon R6 M255DX
G3D Mark Score	600	605
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 910M	Radeon R6 M255DX
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce 910M	Radeon R6 M255DX
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 910M) vs 12_0 (Radeon R6 M255DX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce 910M	Radeon R6 M255DX
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_0
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 910M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R6 M255DX). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	GeForce 910M	Radeon R6 M255DX
Encoder	None	VCE 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP5	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 910M draws 33W versus the Radeon R6 M255DX's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon R6 M255DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 910M) vs 350W (Radeon R6 M255DX). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.