GeForce 9300 GE vs Quadro FX 4000

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300 GE

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4000

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9300 GE vs Quadro FX 4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300 GE vs Quadro FX 4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300 GE vs Quadro FX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300 GE

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,176 less on MSRP ($23 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 9555.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($23 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 4000

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 9460.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,199 MSRPvs$23 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $23 MSRP).
  • 354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9300 GE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (102 vs 101), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9300 GE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9300 GE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,176 cheaper on MSRP at $23 vs $2,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 9555.5% (4.4 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 9300 GE vs Quadro FX 4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300 GE

The GeForce 9300 GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4000

The Quadro FX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 101 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300 GE scores 102 and the Quadro FX 4000 reaches 101 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 GE is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 4000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300 GE) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4000). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 GE) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4000).

FeatureGeForce 9300 GEQuadro FX 4000
G3D Mark Score
102
101
Architecture
Maxwell
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS+56%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
24+200%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L2 Cache
1 MB+426%
0.19 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9300 GE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9300 GEQuadro FX 4000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300 GE and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300 GE) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4000) — the GeForce 9300 GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9300 GEQuadro FX 4000
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+426%
0.19 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300 GE draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 4000's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 9300 GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300 GE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 9300 GEQuadro FX 4000
TDP
33W-78%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
Height
106mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
3.1+343%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9300 GE came in at $23, while the Quadro FX 4000 launched at $2199. On MSRP, GeForce 9300 GE was 99% cheaper ($2176 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.4 (GeForce 9300 GE) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 4000) — the GeForce 9300 GE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9300 GE (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9300 GEQuadro FX 4000
MSRP
$23-99%
$2199
Performance per Dollar
4.4
0.0
Codename
GM108
GT200B
Release
March 13 2015
November 11 2008
Ranking
#810
#884

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.