
GeForce 9300 GE

Quadro FX 4000
GeForce 9300 GE vs Quadro FX 4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9300 GE vs Quadro FX 4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9300 GE vs Quadro FX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9300 GE
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,176 less on MSRP ($23 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 9555.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($23 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 4000
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌9460.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$23 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $23 MSRP).
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9300 GE vs Quadro FX 4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9300 GE
The GeForce 9300 GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

Quadro FX 4000
The Quadro FX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 101 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300 GE scores 102 and the Quadro FX 4000 reaches 101 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 GE is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 4000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300 GE) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4000). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 GE) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4000).
| Feature | GeForce 9300 GE | Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 102 | 101 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS+56% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9300 GE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 GE | Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300 GE and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300 GE) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4000) — the GeForce 9300 GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 GE | Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300 GE draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 4000's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 9300 GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300 GE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 GE | Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 106mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1+343% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9300 GE came in at $23, while the Quadro FX 4000 launched at $2199. On MSRP, GeForce 9300 GE was 99% cheaper ($2176 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.4 (GeForce 9300 GE) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 4000) — the GeForce 9300 GE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9300 GE (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9300 GE | Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $23-99% | $2199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.4 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | GT200B |
| Release | March 13 2015 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #810 | #884 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














