
GeForce 9300M G

GeForce G 105M
GeForce 9300M G vs GeForce G 105M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9300M G vs GeForce G 105M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9300M G vs GeForce G 105M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9300M G
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 60W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce G 105M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce G 105M
2016Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 60W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9300M G vs GeForce G 105M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9300M G
The GeForce 9300M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points.

GeForce G 105M
The GeForce G 105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9300M G scores 85 versus the GeForce G 105M's 92 — the GeForce G 105M leads by 8.2%. The GeForce 9300M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce G 105M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M G) vs 640 (GeForce G 105M). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M G) vs 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce G 105M). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1392 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce G 105M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 85 | 92+8% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 1.862 TFLOPS+342% |
| Boost Clock | 549 MHz | 1392 MHz+154% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 240 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce G 105M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9300M G has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce G 105M carries 512 MB. GeForce G 105M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300M G and 128-bit on the GeForce G 105M.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce G 105M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9300M G) vs 10.0 (GeForce G 105M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce G 105M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9300M G) vs No (GeForce G 105M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G 105M).
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce G 105M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300M G draws 33W versus the GeForce G 105M's 60W — a 58.1% difference. The GeForce 9300M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M G) vs 350W (GeForce G 105M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce G 105M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-45% | 60W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.6+73% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce G 105M (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 9300M G | GeForce G 105M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GP107 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | October 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #880 | #443 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














