GeForce 9300M G vs Quadro FX 370

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300M G

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 370

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9300M G vs Quadro FX 370 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300M G vs Quadro FX 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300M G vs Quadro FX 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300M G

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $99 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Delivers 335.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 189W, a 156W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 370

2008

Why buy it

  • 2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 330% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
  • 472.7% higher power demand at 189W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9300M G instead at 85 vs 84, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9300M G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9300M G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 335.1% (2.8 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 370 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 9300M G vs Quadro FX 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300M G

The GeForce 9300M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300M G scores 85 and the Quadro FX 370 reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300M G is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M G) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M G) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370).

FeatureGeForce 9300M GQuadro FX 370
G3D Mark Score
85+1%
84
Architecture
Maxwell
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS+48%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9300M G gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9300M GQuadro FX 370
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300M G and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 370. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300M G) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 370) — the GeForce 9300M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9300M GQuadro FX 370
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9300M G) vs 10.0 (Quadro FX 370). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9300M GQuadro FX 370
DirectX
10.0
10.0
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9300M G) vs None (Quadro FX 370). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M G) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 370).

FeatureGeForce 9300M GQuadro FX 370
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo 2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300M G draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 9300M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M G) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce 9300M GQuadro FX 370
TDP
33W-83%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
2.6+550%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9300M G came in at $30, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce 9300M G was 76.7% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (GeForce 9300M G) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 370) — the GeForce 9300M G offers 300% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9300M G (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9300M GQuadro FX 370
MSRP
$30-77%
$129
Performance per Dollar
2.8+300%
0.7
Codename
GM108
GT200B
Release
March 13 2015
November 11 2008
Ranking
#880
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.