
GeForce 9400

Radeon RX 5700
GeForce 9400 vs Radeon RX 5700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9400 vs Radeon RX 5700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9400 vs Radeon RX 5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9400
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 180W, a 147W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 270mm, a 102mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅3757.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 1413.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 33W.
- ❌60.7% longer card at 270mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9400 vs Radeon RX 5700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9400
The GeForce 9400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points.

Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9400 scores 147 versus the Radeon RX 5700's 14,296 — the Radeon RX 5700 leads by 9625.2%. The GeForce 9400 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 147 | 14,296+9625% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2304+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 7.949 TFLOPS+780% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1725 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 144+500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce 9400 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce 9400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 5700 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 5700. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10 (GeForce 9400) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.1. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10 | 12.0+20% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9400) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9400 draws 33W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 138% difference. The GeForce 9400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: Legacy vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 270mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-82% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 270mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5 | 79.4+1664% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9400 came in at $59, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. On MSRP, GeForce 9400 was 84.4% cheaper ($320 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GeForce 9400) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 1408% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 5700 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59-84% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 37.7+1408% |
| Codename | GM108 | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #847 | #167 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














