G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 940A vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 940A vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 940A

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $519 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 200W, a 167W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅1118.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 224.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 13.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌506.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1118.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2331.7% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 1,107), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce 940A is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $519 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $80, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 224.8% (44.9 vs 13.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 940A vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 940A

The GeForce 940A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,107 points.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 940A scores 1,107 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 2331.7%. The GeForce 940A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 940A) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 940A) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 940A	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	1,107	26,919+2332%
Architecture	Maxwell	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384	5888+1433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	29.15 TFLOPS+3277%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	2475 MHz+120%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	16	184+1050%
L1 Cache	0.19 MB	5.8 MB+2953%
L2 Cache	1 MB	36 MB+3500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce 940A does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 940A is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce 940A	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 940A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 940A and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 940A) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 940A	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	12 GB+2300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	504 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	36 MB+3500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 940A) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce 940A	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	11.0	12.2+11%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2 (GeForce 940A) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 940A) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	GeForce 940A	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	NVENC 2	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 940A draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 940A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940A) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce 940A	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	33W-84%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-46%	650W
Power Connector	Legacy	8-pin
Length	0mm	304mm
Height	0mm	137mm
Slots	0-100%	3
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	33.5	134.6+302%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 940A came in at $80, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce 940A was 86.6% cheaper ($519 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.8 (GeForce 940A) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 225.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 940A	GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP	$80-87%	$599
Performance per Dollar	13.8	44.9+225%
Codename	GM108	AD104
Release	March 13 2015	April 12 2023
Ranking	#853	#32

Search GeForce 940A on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.