GeForce 940A
VS
Quadro K620M

GeForce 940A vs Quadro K620M

NVIDIA

GeForce 940A

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K620M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 940A is positioned at rank 320 and the Quadro K620M is on rank 101, so the Quadro K620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 940A

#310
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
784%
#312
711%
#313
709%
#317
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
645%
#318
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
641%
#320
GeForce 940A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
99%
#326
Iris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
98%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
97%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
93%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
92%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
92%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
90%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620M

#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
100%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
99%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
97%
#57
Quadro RTX 3000
MSRP: $800|Avg: $891
94%
#58
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700
92%
#59
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
88%
#60
Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP: $999|Avg: $350
87%
#86
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1020%
#101
Quadro K620M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#105
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
96%
#111
Quadro P520
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#113
Radeon Pro WX 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K620M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 940A.

InsightGeForce 940AQuadro K620M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%)
Leading raw performance (+4.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K620M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 940A and Quadro K620M

NVIDIA

GeForce 940A

The GeForce 940A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,107 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K620M

The Quadro K620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,159 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 940A scores 1,107 and the Quadro K620M reaches 1,159 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940A is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K620M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 940A) vs 384 (Quadro K620M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 940A) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620M). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 940AQuadro K620M
G3D Mark Score
1,107
1,159+5%
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
0.8632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1124 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
16
16
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 940AQuadro K620M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 940A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K620M has 4 GB. The Quadro K620M offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 940AQuadro K620M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 940A draws 33W versus the Quadro K620M's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Quadro K620M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940A) vs 350W (Quadro K620M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 940AQuadro K620M
TDP
33W
30W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
33.5
38.6+15%