
GeForce 940A vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

GeForce 940A
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 940A is positioned at rank #320 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 940A
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 940A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 940A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU).
| Insight | GeForce 940A | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Gen. 11 (2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 940A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 940A and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

GeForce 940A
The GeForce 940A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,107 points.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Gen. 11 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 4W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 940A scores 1,107 and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940A is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) uses Gen. 11, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 940A) vs 24 (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 940A | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,107 | 1,100 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+1500% | 24 |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+41% | 800 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 940A | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 940A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has 0 MB. The GeForce 940A offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce 940A | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 940A) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 940A | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2 (GeForce 940A) vs QuickSync (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 940A) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)).
| Feature | GeForce 940A | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 940A draws 33W versus the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)'s 4W — a 156.8% difference. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940A) vs 1W (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce 940A | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 4W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 33.5 | 275.0+721% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 940A launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) costs 100+% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.8 (GeForce 940A) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) — the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 940A | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | Gen. 11 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #853 | #918 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















