
GeForce 940M vs Radeon 610M

GeForce 940M
Popular choices:

Radeon 610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 940M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 940M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 940M | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 940M and Radeon 610M

GeForce 940M
The GeForce 940M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,133 points.

Radeon 610M
The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 940M scores 1,133 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 940M) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 940M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 940M | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,133 | 1,157+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+200% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+60% | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 2200 MHz+87% |
| ROPs | 8+100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 24+200% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 940M | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 940M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 610M has 512 MB. The GeForce 940M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 940M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 940M | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 940M) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 940M | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 940M) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce 940M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).
| Feature | GeForce 940M | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Maxwell) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP6) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 940M draws 33W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 75% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940M) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 940M | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.3 | 77.1+125% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














