GeForce 940M vs Radeon 610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 940M vs Radeon 610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 940M vs Radeon 610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 940M

2015

Why buy it

✅3.1% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.

Radeon 610M

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 940M across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 940M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.1% in average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 610M instead at 1,157 vs 1,133, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 610M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 610M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce 940M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 940M vs Radeon 610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 940M

The GeForce 940M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,133 points.

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 940M scores 1,133 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 940M) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 940M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 940M	Radeon 610M
G3D Mark Score	1,133	1,157+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384+200%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS+60%	0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1176 MHz	2200 MHz+87%
ROPs	8+100%	4
TMUs	24+200%	8
L1 Cache	192 KB+500%	32 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 940M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 610M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 940M	Radeon 610M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 940M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 610M carries 512 MB. GeForce 940M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 940M and System on the Radeon 610M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 940M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 940M	Radeon 610M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 940M) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce 940M	Radeon 610M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 940M) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce 940M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).

Feature	GeForce 940M	Radeon 610M
Encoder	NVENC (Maxwell)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP6)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 940M draws 33W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 75% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940M) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.