GeForce 940M vs Radeon R9 M265X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 940M vs Radeon R9 M265X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 940M vs Radeon R9 M265X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 940M

2015

Why buy it

✅25.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M265X

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 940M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 940M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 25.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M265X instead at 1,167 vs 1,133, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 940M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M265X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M265X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 940M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 940M vs Radeon R9 M265X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 940M

The GeForce 940M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,133 points.

Radeon R9 M265X

The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 940M scores 1,133 and the Radeon R9 M265X reaches 1,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M265X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 940M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M265X). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 940M) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 625 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 940M	Radeon R9 M265X
G3D Mark Score	1,133	1,167+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS+13%	0.8 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1176 MHz+88%	625 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	192 KB+20%	160 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 940M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M265X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 940M	Radeon R9 M265X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 940M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M265X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M265X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 940M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M265X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 940M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M265X) — the GeForce 940M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 940M	Radeon R9 M265X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 940M draws 33W versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 940M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M265X). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce 940M	Radeon R9 M265X
TDP	33W-56%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Mobile
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	34.3+120%	15.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 940M (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce 940M	Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP	—	$200
Codename	GM108	Venus
Release	March 13 2015	March 21 2014
Ranking	#847	#839

Search GeForce 940M on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M265X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.