CPU
GPU
GeForce 9450
Popular choices:
GeForce 8400M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9450 is positioned at rank 690 and the GeForce 8400M GS is on rank 637, so the GeForce 8400M GS offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9450
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8400M GS.
| Insight | GeForce 9450 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8400M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8400M GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 23.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9450 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9450 and GeForce 8400M GS
GeForce 9450
The GeForce 9450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.
GeForce 8400M GS
The GeForce 8400M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9450 scores 105 and the GeForce 8400M GS reaches 104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9450 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8400M GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9450) vs 384 (GeForce 8400M GS). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9450) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GS). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105 | 104 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS+51% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz | 1124 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+150% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9450 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8400M GS has 128 MB. The GeForce 9450 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9450) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GS) — the GeForce 9450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9450) vs 10_0 (GeForce 8400M GS). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+11% | 10_0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Tesla) (GeForce 9450) vs PureVideo (GeForce 8400M GS). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9450) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9 (GeForce 8400M GS).
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (Tesla) | PureVideo |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9450 draws 75W versus the GeForce 8400M GS's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 8400M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9450) vs 350W (GeForce 8400M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 33W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 3.2+129% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9450 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce 8400M GS launched at $50 and now averages $20. The GeForce 8400M GS costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.2 (GeForce 9450) vs 5.2 (GeForce 8400M GS) — the GeForce 8400M GS offers 23.8% better value. The GeForce 9450 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $50-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $20-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.2 | 5.2+24% |
| Codename | GM107 | GM108 |
| Release | October 27 2015 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #671 | #854 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9450 and GeForce 8400M GS
