
GeForce 945A vs FirePro M5100

GeForce 945A
Popular choices:

FirePro M5100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 945A is positioned at rank #262 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 945A
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 945A.
| Insight | GeForce 945A | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 945A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 945A holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $30), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 18.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 945A | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+18.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 945A and FirePro M5100

GeForce 945A
The GeForce 945A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1189 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,852 points.

FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 945A scores 1,852 and the FirePro M5100 reaches 1,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 945A is built on Maxwell while the FirePro M5100 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 945A) vs 640 (FirePro M5100). Raw compute: 0.9132 TFLOPS (GeForce 945A) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100). Boost clocks: 1189 MHz vs 775 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,852 | 1,874+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9132 TFLOPS | 0.992 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 1189 MHz+53% | 775 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 945A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M5100 has 2 GB. The FirePro M5100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 945A) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro M5100) — the GeForce 945A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 945A) vs 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 945A) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GeForce 945A) vs H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100).
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 945A draws 33W versus the FirePro M5100's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 945A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 945A) vs 350W (FirePro M5100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 82mm |
| Height | — | 70mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1+349% | 12.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 945A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the FirePro M5100 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The GeForce 945A costs 16.7% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.1 (GeForce 945A) vs 62.5 (FirePro M5100) — the GeForce 945A offers 18.6% better value. The GeForce 945A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-17% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.1+19% | 62.5 |
| Codename | GM108 | Venus |
| Release | March 13 2015 | October 16 2013 |
| Ranking | #705 | #701 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















