
GeForce 945A vs FirePro M6000

GeForce 945A
Popular choices:

FirePro M6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 945A is positioned at rank 262 and the FirePro M6000 is on rank 193, so the FirePro M6000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 945A
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 945A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 945A | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 945A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 945A holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 103.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 945A | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 945A and FirePro M6000

GeForce 945A
The GeForce 945A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1189 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,852 points.

FirePro M6000
The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 945A scores 1,852 and the FirePro M6000 reaches 1,820 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 945A is built on Maxwell while the FirePro M6000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 945A) vs 640 (FirePro M6000). Raw compute: 0.9132 TFLOPS (GeForce 945A) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000).
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,852+2% | 1,820 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9132 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+12% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 945A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M6000 has 2 GB. The FirePro M6000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 945A) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro M6000) — the GeForce 945A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 945A) vs 11.1 (FirePro M6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+8% | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 6+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 945A) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GeForce 945A) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000).
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 945A draws 33W versus the FirePro M6000's 43W — a 26.3% difference. The GeForce 945A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 945A) vs 350W (FirePro M6000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-23% | 43W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1+33% | 42.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 945A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the FirePro M6000 launched at $300 and now averages $50. The GeForce 945A costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.1 (GeForce 945A) vs 36.4 (FirePro M6000) — the GeForce 945A offers 103.6% better value. The GeForce 945A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 945A | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-67% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-50% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.1+104% | 36.4 |
| Codename | GM108 | Heathrow |
| Release | March 13 2015 | July 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #705 | #710 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















