
GeForce 9500M G
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce 9500M G
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce Go 7800
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
GeForce 9500M G
2015GeForce Go 7800
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce 9500M G better than GeForce Go 7800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce Go 7800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9500M G and GeForce Go 7800

GeForce 9500M G
GeForce 9500M G
The GeForce 9500M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points.

GeForce Go 7800
GeForce Go 7800
The GeForce Go 7800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9500M G scores 122 versus the GeForce Go 7800's 115 — the GeForce 9500M G leads by 6.1%. The GeForce 9500M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 7800 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9500M G) vs 2,304 (GeForce Go 7800). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9500M G) vs 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 122+6% | 115 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2304+260% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS | 4.156 TFLOPS+218% |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz+13% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 192+380% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9500M G comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7800 has 256 MB. The GeForce 9500M G offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9500M G) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800) — the GeForce 9500M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9500M G) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9500M G) vs None (GeForce Go 7800). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9500M G) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce Go 7800).
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9500M G draws 75W versus the GeForce Go 7800's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce 9500M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500M G) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7800). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6+220% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9500M G is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30 | — |
| Codename | GM107 | GK110 |
| Release | October 27 2015 | May 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #671 | #320 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












