
GeForce 9300
Popular choices:

GeForce 9500M G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce 9300
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$60 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
GeForce 9500M G
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.
GeForce 9300
2015GeForce 9500M G
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$60 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce 9300 better than GeForce 9500M G?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce 9500M G still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9300 and GeForce 9500M G

GeForce 9300
GeForce 9300
The GeForce 9300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

GeForce 9500M G
GeForce 9500M G
The GeForce 9500M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300 scores 127 and the GeForce 9500M G reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9500M G uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300) vs 640 (GeForce 9500M G). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9500M G). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1020 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 127+4% | 122 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 1.306 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1020 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300) vs 2 MB (GeForce 9500M G) — the GeForce 9500M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9500M G). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+11% | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9300) vs No (GeForce 9500M G). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9500M G).
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300 draws 33W versus the GeForce 9500M G's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 9300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300) vs 350W (GeForce 9500M G). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.8+137% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9300 launched at $60 MSRP, while the GeForce 9500M G launched at $30. The GeForce 9500M G costs 50% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (GeForce 9300) vs 4.1 (GeForce 9500M G) — the GeForce 9500M G offers 95.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 9500M G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $30-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 4.1+95% |
| Codename | GM108 | GM107 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | October 27 2015 |
| Ranking | #810 | #671 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












