
GeForce 9500M G

Radeon HD 4250
GeForce 9500M G vs Radeon HD 4250 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9500M G vs Radeon HD 4250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9500M G vs Radeon HD 4250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9500M G
2015Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 4250
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9500M G across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% HIGHER MSRP$50 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9500M G vs Radeon HD 4250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9500M G
The GeForce 9500M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points.

Radeon HD 4250
The Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9500M G scores 122 and the Radeon HD 4250 reaches 123 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9500M G is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4250 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9500M G) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4250). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9500M G) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4250).
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 122 | 123 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS+31% | 1 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9500M G gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9500M G and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4250. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9500M G) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4250) — the GeForce 9500M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9500M G) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9500M G) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4250). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9500M G draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 4250's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The GeForce 9500M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500M G) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4250). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-32% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6+45% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9500M G came in at $30, while the Radeon HD 4250 launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce 9500M G was 40% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce 9500M G) vs 2.5 (Radeon HD 4250) — the GeForce 9500M G offers 64% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9500M G (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9500M G | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1+64% | 2.5 |
| Codename | GM107 | RV770 |
| Release | October 27 2015 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #671 | #876 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














