GeForce 9600 GT
VS
FirePro V5700

GeForce 9600 GT vs FirePro V5700

NVIDIA

GeForce 9600 GT

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS

FirePro V5700

2011Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9600 GT is positioned at rank 578 and the FirePro V5700 is on rank 368, so the FirePro V5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9600 GT

#566
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3425%
#568
3105%
#569
3097%
#573
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2816%
#574
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2797%
#576
Radeon R5 M320
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#577
100%
#578
GeForce 9600 GT
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
100%
#579
100%
#580
Radeon HD 8650G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
97%
#581
Mobility Radeon HD 4570
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
97%
#582
Radeon Vega 10
MSRP: $499|Avg: $100
96%
#583
95%
#584
Radeon R7 M440
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
95%
#586
Mobility Radeon HD 4350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
93%
#587
GeForce 405
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
93%
#588
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
93%
#589
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
93%
#590
GeForce 510
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
92%
#591
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5700

#352
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
18940%
#367
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
100%
#368
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
100%
#369
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
91%
#370
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
87%
#371
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
85%
#372
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
83%
#373
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
78%
#374
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
78%
#375
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
78%
#376
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
77%
#377
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
74%
#378
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
72%
#379
Tesla M2090
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40
72%
#380
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
68%
#381
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
68%
#382
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
60%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9600 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V5700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce 9600 GTFirePro V5700
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9600 GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9600 GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 9600 GTFirePro V5700
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9600 GT and FirePro V5700

NVIDIA

GeForce 9600 GT

The GeForce 9600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points.

AMD

FirePro V5700

The FirePro V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 465 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9600 GT scores 473 and the FirePro V5700 reaches 465 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9600 GT is built on G9x while the FirePro V5700 uses TeraScale 3, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600 GT) vs 1,280 (FirePro V5700).

FeatureGeForce 9600 GTFirePro V5700
G3D Mark Score
473+2%
465
Architecture
G9x
TeraScale 3
Process Node
65 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
224
1280+471%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9600 GTFirePro V5700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9600 GT comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V5700 has 4 GB. The FirePro V5700 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 9600 GTFirePro V5700
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9600 GT) vs 10.1 (FirePro V5700). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9600 GTFirePro V5700
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+10%
10.1
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce 9600 GT) vs None (FirePro V5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9600 GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro V5700).

FeatureGeForce 9600 GTFirePro V5700
Encoder
PureVideo HD
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9600 GT draws 150W versus the FirePro V5700's 150W — a 0% difference. The FirePro V5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600 GT) vs 350W (FirePro V5700). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.

FeatureGeForce 9600 GTFirePro V5700
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
168mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80
75-6%
Perf/Watt
3.2+3%
3.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9600 GT launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro V5700 launched at $599 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.6 (GeForce 9600 GT) vs 23.3 (FirePro V5700) — the GeForce 9600 GT offers 1.3% better value. The FirePro V5700 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9600 GTFirePro V5700
MSRP
$149-75%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$20
Performance per Dollar
23.6+1%
23.3
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Cayman
Release
July 15 2008
May 24 2011
Ranking
#825
#656