GeForce 9600 GT vs Radeon R5 M320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9600 GT vs Radeon R5 M320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9600 GT vs Radeon R5 M320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9600 GT

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Radeon R5 M320

2015

Why buy it

✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 M320 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (475 vs 473), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9600 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9600 GT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.2% (3.2 vs 3.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 M320 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 9600 GT vs Radeon R5 M320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9600 GT

The GeForce 9600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points.

Radeon R5 M320

The Radeon R5 M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 475 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9600 GT scores 473 and the Radeon R5 M320 reaches 475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9600 GT is built on G9x while the Radeon R5 M320 uses GCN, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600 GT) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M320).

Feature	GeForce 9600 GT	Radeon R5 M320
G3D Mark Score	473	475
Architecture	G9x	GCN
Process Node	65 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	224	1024+357%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9600 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9600 GT	Radeon R5 M320
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9600 GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M320 carries 512 MB. GeForce 9600 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9600 GT and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M320.

Feature	GeForce 9600 GT	Radeon R5 M320
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9600 GT draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 M320's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600 GT) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M320). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce 9600 GT	Radeon R5 M320
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Mobile
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	3.2	6.3+97%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9600 GT came in at $149, while the Radeon R5 M320 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce 9600 GT was 0.7% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 9600 GT) vs 3.2 (Radeon R5 M320) — the Radeon R5 M320 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M320 (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9600 GT	Radeon R5 M320
MSRP	$149	$150
Performance per Dollar	3.2	3.2
Codename	NB9E-GTX	Pitcairn
Release	July 15 2008	June 9 2015
Ranking	#825	#522

Search GeForce 9600 GT on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.