GeForce 9600M GS
VS
GeForce 310M

GeForce 9600M GS vs GeForce 310M

NVIDIA

GeForce 9600M GS

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 310M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9600M GS is positioned at rank 653 and the GeForce 310M is on rank 613, so the GeForce 310M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9600M GS

#643
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
5806%
#645
5263%
#646
5249%
#650
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4773%
#651
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4741%
#653
GeForce 9600M GS
MSRP: $70|Avg: $20
100%
#654
Mobility Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#655
Mobility Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $45
99%
#656
GeForce 8800 GT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $25
98%
#657
GeForce 8400
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
96%
#658
96%
#659
GeForce 9800M GTS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
96%
#660
GeForce 8600 GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#661
Radeon HD 2900 GT
MSRP: $170|Avg: $15
92%
#662
Radeon HD 8280E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $110
91%
#663
Radeon R5 M420
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
90%
#664
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
90%
#665
Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
89%
#666
Radeon HD 2900 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
88%
#667
Mobility Radeon 4100
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
88%
#668
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 310M

#603
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4274%
#605
3875%
#606
3865%
#610
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3514%
#611
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3490%
#613
GeForce 310M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#614
GeForce 205
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#615
GeForce 9600 GSO
MSRP: $129|Avg: $25
98%
#616
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $40
98%
#617
GeForce 9400
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
98%
#618
GeForce 7350 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
97%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
96%
#621
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
95%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
94%
#623
93%
#624
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
91%
#625
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
91%
#626
89%
#627
89%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 310M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 310M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9600M GS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9600M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 310M.

InsightGeForce 9600M GSGeForce 310M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 9600M GS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9600M GS and GeForce 310M

NVIDIA

GeForce 9600M GS

The GeForce 9600M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 131 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 310M

The GeForce 310M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9600M GS scores 131 and the GeForce 310M reaches 127 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9600M GS is built on G9x while the GeForce 310M uses Maxwell, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 384 (GeForce 310M).

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSGeForce 310M
G3D Mark Score
131+3%
127
Architecture
G9x
Maxwell
Process Node
65 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
384+71%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSGeForce 310M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9600M GS comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 310M has 512 MB. The GeForce 9600M GS offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSGeForce 310M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 10.1 (GeForce 310M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSGeForce 310M
DirectX
10.0
10.1
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9600M GS) vs None (GeForce 310M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310M).

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSGeForce 310M
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
PureVideo VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9600M GS draws 150W versus the GeForce 310M's 33W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 310M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 350W (GeForce 310M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSGeForce 310M
TDP
150W
33W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
0.9
3.8+322%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 310M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSGeForce 310M
MSRP
$70
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Codename
NB9E-GTX
GM108
Release
July 15 2008
March 13 2015
Ranking
#825
#880