GeForce 9800 S
VS
FirePro V3900

GeForce 9800 S vs FirePro V3900

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800 S

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS

FirePro V3900

2011Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800 S is positioned at rank 510 and the FirePro V3900 is on rank 206, so the FirePro V3900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800 S

#500
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2561%
#502
2321%
#503
2315%
#507
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2105%
#508
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2091%
#510
GeForce 9800 S
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
100%
#511
Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
100%
#512
100%
#513
Radeon HD 7660D
MSRP: $122|Avg: $15
99%
#514
99%
#515
Radeon HD 8650G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#516
98%
#517
GeForce 8200
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
97%
#518
Mobility Radeon HD 545v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#519
GeForce 9500M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
96%
#520
96%
#521
95%
#522
Radeon HD 8550G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#523
Radeon HD 8610G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#524
94%
#525
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V3900

#90
Quadro P5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
96%
#91
RTX PRO 6000
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
95%
#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
93%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
92%
#191
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2787%
#206
FirePro V3900
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
100%
#207
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP: $119|Avg: $89
100%
#208
Tesla K8
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
96%
#210
GRID K240Q
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
96%
#211
FirePro M4150
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
95%
#212
FirePro V4900
MSRP: $200|Avg: $47
95%
#213
GRID K160Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
95%
#215
Quadro
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#216
FirePro W5000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
93%
#219
FirePro W7000 Adapter
MSRP: $899|Avg: $15
92%
#220
Quadro K420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9800 S is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V3900 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce 9800 SFirePro V3900
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro V3900 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V3900 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 32.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 9800 SFirePro V3900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+32.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800 S and FirePro V3900

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800 S

The GeForce 9800 S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 636 points.

AMD

FirePro V3900

The FirePro V3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 631 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9800 S scores 636 and the FirePro V3900 reaches 631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800 S is built on G9x while the FirePro V3900 uses TeraScale 3, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800 S) vs 1,280 (FirePro V3900).

FeatureGeForce 9800 SFirePro V3900
G3D Mark Score
636
631
Architecture
G9x
TeraScale 3
Process Node
65 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
224
1280+471%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9800 SFirePro V3900
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9800 S comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V3900 has 1 GB. The FirePro V3900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 9800 SFirePro V3900
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9800 S) vs 11.0 (FirePro V3900). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9800 SFirePro V3900
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
11.0
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Tesla) (GeForce 9800 S) vs None (FirePro V3900). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9800 S) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (FirePro V3900).

FeatureGeForce 9800 SFirePro V3900
Encoder
No NVENC (Tesla)
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800 S draws 150W versus the FirePro V3900's 150W — a 0% difference. The FirePro V3900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800 S) vs 350W (FirePro V3900). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce 9800 SFirePro V3900
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
80-6%
Perf/Watt
4.2
4.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9800 S launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro V3900 launched at $119 and now averages $30. The FirePro V3900 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.9 (GeForce 9800 S) vs 21.0 (FirePro V3900) — the FirePro V3900 offers 32.1% better value. The FirePro V3900 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9800 SFirePro V3900
MSRP
$150
$119-21%
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$30-25%
Performance per Dollar
15.9
21.0+32%
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Cayman
Release
July 15 2008
May 24 2011
Ranking
#825
#656