
GeForce 9800 S

GeForce GTX 280M SLI
GeForce 9800 S vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9800 S vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9800 S vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9800 S
2008Why buy it
- ✅3.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
2009Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: G9x (2007−2010) on 55nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9800 S across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9800 S vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9800 S
The GeForce 9800 S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 636 points.

GeForce GTX 280M SLI
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 585 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 621 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800 S scores 636 and the GeForce GTX 280M SLI reaches 621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800 S is built on G9x while the GeForce GTX 280M SLI uses G9x, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800 S) vs 256 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce 9800 S | GeForce GTX 280M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 636+2% | 621 |
| Architecture | G9x | G9x |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 256+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9800 S | GeForce GTX 280M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9800 S and 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
| Feature | GeForce 9800 S | GeForce GTX 280M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9800 S) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280M SLI). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9800 S | GeForce GTX 280M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Tesla) (GeForce 9800 S) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9800 S) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce 9800 S | GeForce GTX 280M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (Tesla) | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800 S draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 280M SLI's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800 S) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 280M SLI). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9800 S | GeForce GTX 280M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-11% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.2+2% | 4.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 280M SLI (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9800 S | GeForce GTX 280M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | N10E-GTX |
| Release | July 15 2008 | March 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #825 | #793 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














