
GeForce 9800M GT

GeForce GTX 260M
GeForce 9800M GT vs GeForce GTX 260M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9800M GT vs GeForce GTX 260M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9800M GT vs GeForce GTX 260M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9800M GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅12.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($160 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 182W, a 32W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTX 260M
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) on 65nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9800M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌21.3% higher power demand at 182W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9800M GT vs GeForce GTX 260M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9800M GT
The GeForce 9800M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points.

GeForce GTX 260M
The GeForce GTX 260M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800M GT scores 381 and the GeForce GTX 260M reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GT is built on G9x while the GeForce GTX 260M uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 65 nm process. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 260M).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 381 | 382 |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 224+17% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9800M GT has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 260M carries 1 GB. GeForce GTX 260M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9800M GT and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 260M.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1 (10_0)+11% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800M GT) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800M GT draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 260M's 182W — a 19.3% difference. The GeForce 9800M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 260M). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-18% | 182W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 85°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5+19% | 2.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













